> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://docs.console.zenlayer.com/welcome/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://docs.console.zenlayer.com/welcome/elastic-compute/networking/01-overview/02-network-types.md).

# Network Types

Every EIP picks a **network type** at creation time. Network type is fixed for the lifetime of that object — switching network types means creating a new EIP on the other network and cutting over.

It matters for billing because **different networks have different per-Mbps prices**. It matters for performance because the network type decides which autonomous system actually carries your packets between the POP and the rest of the internet.

The available values are:

| Network Type     | Who operates it                                       | Typical use                                      |
| ---------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ |
| **Premium BGP**  | Zenlayer AS21859 + AS4229 backbone                    | Real-time, interactive, low-latency user traffic |
| **Standard BGP** | Zenlayer, blended transit (Cogent, regional carriers) | CDN origin egress, VPN, backup, bulk traffic     |

The console shows only the network types available in your selected region.

***

## Zenlayer BGP — Standard vs. Premium

Zenlayer operates the `BGP` network type in two tiers. Both are ZEC-native; the difference is which autonomous systems carry your packets.

### Premium BGP — AS21859 edge + AS4229 backbone

The premium tier uses **AS21859** as the public-facing transit ASN at the POP, and **AS4229** as the private inter-POP backbone. The split is visible in public routing data, and it explains where the latency and reach advantages come from:

| Source                                  | AS21859 (peering edge)                                                                    | AS4229 (backbone)                                                       |
| --------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| PeeringDB declared traffic              | 10–20 Tbps                                                                                | 20–50 Tbps                                                              |
| PeeringDB declared IPv4 / IPv6 capacity | 20 000 / 10 000 prefixes                                                                  | 100 000 / 50 000 prefixes                                               |
| Public peering exchanges                | \~170                                                                                     | \~24 (selective, with hyperscalers)                                     |
| Scope                                   | Global                                                                                    | Global                                                                  |
| Traffic ratio                           | Heavy outbound                                                                            | Heavy outbound                                                          |
| Peering policy                          | Selective                                                                                 | Selective                                                               |
| Network type (PeeringDB)                | Content                                                                                   | Content                                                                 |
| Upstreams observed                      | Arelion (1299), Cogent (174), NTT (2914), Tata (6453), Lumen (3356)                       | Arelion (1299), PCCW Global (3491), NTT (2914), GTT (3257), Zayo (6461) |
| Notable direct peers                    | 800+ peers — regional ISPs across APAC/EMEA (Bharti Airtel, Viettel, Etisalat, many more) | Google, AWS, Microsoft, Cloudflare, Meta, Apple, Netflix, ByteDance     |

Read that table as two layers of one product:

* **AS4229 is where the hyperscaler peering lives.** It is present at fewer public IXes (\~24) but those are the high-value ones where Google/AWS/Microsoft/Meta/Apple/Netflix/ByteDance peer directly. Traffic to those destinations lands in one AS hop.
* **AS21859 is the broader peering fabric.** It joins \~170 exchanges and peers with hundreds of regional ISPs — the networks that actually carry last-mile traffic to users in Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and LATAM.

What that buys you on the wire:

* Lower median RTT for most destinations reachable via a direct peer.
* Tighter p95/p99 latency, since backbone transport does not share fate with the public internet between POPs.
* Shorter AS paths to APAC and EMEA consumer networks.

**Pick Premium BGP for:** real-time and interactive workloads — gaming, VoIP, trading, SaaS APIs, user-facing web traffic where tail latency matters.

### Standard BGP — Zenlayer-operated, blended upstreams

Standard BGP is still Zenlayer's network — same POP, same EIP primitive, same set of billing methods — but the path under the EIP is built from **more cost-effective upstreams and transit arrangements**. You give up some of the peering density and path length that Premium gets from AS4229 + AS21859; in exchange the per-Mbps price is materially lower.

Characteristics:

* Uses a blend of commercial transit in addition to private peering.
* Routing typically takes more AS hops for some destinations compared with Premium.
* Connectivity and latency are not as tight — the degradation is most visible on consumer last-mile networks in Asia-Pacific.
* Per-Mbps price is noticeably lower than Premium.

**Pick Standard BGP for:** CDN origin egress, VPN backhaul, backup and replication, batch ETL, software distribution, log/telemetry egress — any workload where bytes dominate and an extra few milliseconds of RTT does not change the user experience.

### Regions where Standard BGP is available

Standard BGP is currently exposed on these ZEC regions:

| Area                   | Region             | POP              |
| ---------------------- | ------------------ | ---------------- |
| Americas               | `na-west-1`        | Los Angeles      |
| Americas               | `na-central-2`     | Dallas           |
| Americas               | `na-east-1`        | Washington, D.C. |
| Americas               | `na-south-1`       | Miami            |
| Europe and Middle East | `europe-central-1` | Frankfurt        |
| Europe and Middle East | `europe-south-1`   | Marseille        |

Premium BGP is available on all ZEC regions. If a region you need is not listed above, Premium BGP is the default path; the console shows only the network types applicable to the region you pick.

### The quick rule

* Does an extra 20–40 ms of RTT break an SLO or degrade UX? → **Premium BGP**.
* Is the workload dominated by bytes, not by handshake latency? → **Standard BGP**.

***

## How this interacts with billing

The network type is picked at creation — it is an attribute of the EIP. Once picked:

* **It sets the per-Mbps unit price.** Each network has its own rate card. Premium BGP is at the top; Standard BGP is lower. The billing *method* ([Data Transfer](/welcome/elastic-compute/networking/01-overview/03-data-transfer.md) / [Flat Rate](/welcome/elastic-compute/networking/01-overview/04-flat-rate.md) / [Aggregated 95th](/welcome/elastic-compute/networking/01-overview/05-aggregated-95th.md)) is orthogonal to the network type — each method bills against the rate of whatever network you picked.
* **It decides the path and the latency.** Switching meter does not move traffic; switching network type does.
* **It is fixed per object.** If you need to change network type, create a new EIP on the other network and migrate.

***

## Rule of thumb

* **User-facing, interactive, global?** Premium BGP.
* **CDN / VPN / backup / bulk egress?** Standard BGP.

Start with the network type that matches the workload's latency tolerance, and let the billing method decide how that bandwidth is metered on top.
